On Monday 11 November, Bishop Helen-Ann responded to the Government's Autumn Budget during a debate in the House of Lords, addressing the impact on child poverty, farming and connectivity. Read the full speech below.
My Lords, I am feeling my B in GCSE maths challenging my ability to speak with any fiscal authority in this debate today but am glad of the opportunity to do so.
Congratulations to the noble Lord Booth-Smith on his excellent maiden speech and I welcome him to your Lordships’ House.
I recognise the decisions that the Chancellor has made have not been easy. But balanced alongside the Government’s long-term priorities, we must consider how this Budget will serve the needs of people who are struggling today and effect what surely must be a significant long-term ambition (or perhaps I can use the word ‘mission’) to improve social cohesion.
As I listened to the Chancellor’s Budget speech, I was struck by two things: firstly the determination to grasp nettles, and secondly the resolute focus on investment. Increasing fiscal confidence creates the right conditions for growth. This has short, medium and long-term objectives and outcomes. People, communities, organisations, businesses, even this Chamber represent complex eco-systems. The granularity on the ground makes it harder to see this complexity yet its effect locally can be keenly felt. For example, the decision not to proceed with dualling the section of the A1 that lies in the north of my diocese arguably makes that area and its connectivity routes less attractive to potential investors. The 50% increase in the bus fare cap too will impact people who can least afford it – further disconnecting people from places and opportunities. The flip side is welcoming the alignment of Budget priorities with regional devolution. This is having a positive impact on the NE region: increased voice, agency and confidence has the potential to raise aspirations.
Last week I attended the Northern Farming Conference. I commend attempts to address anomalies in the tax system, but I echo the apprehensions I heard in that Conference that this was not a budget that understands the needs of those in rural communities, who have this year already faced the challenges of flooding. I therefore add my voice to those of others urging the Government to rethink the APR decision. Farmers have a key role to play in assuring food security in an ever-increasing volatile global context. Can the noble Lord the Minister please assure me that the impact of the APR and BPS measures on farming will be assessed and reviewed?
My Lords, I welcome the extension of the Household Support Fund, and the steps taken to reduce the impact of Universal Credit debt deductions, we must address why these measures are necessary in the first place. With a disproportionately high number of children living in poverty in the North East, I believe this Budget missed a crucial opportunity to lift children out of poverty by removing the two-child limit and benefit cap. Child poverty is a stain on our society and I urge the Government to take bold action in addressing its causes and consequences.
There is much that I welcome in this Budget my Lords, but the decisions I have mentioned have consequences that must not be overlooked. I urge the Government to consider the impact of these decisions carefully, ensuring that they truly uplift the most vulnerable to ensure the flourishing of all.